User Menu


spacer image
Steroid Laws
 
Steroid Profiles
steroids
 
  Share
Search
Archive
From:
To:

Category: Nutrition / All Categories

Nutrition Performance - Colostrum: The Ultimate Source of Protein?

Nutrition Performance - Colostrum: The Ultimate Source of Protein?

 

Athletes engaged in heavy training need more protein than sedentary

people.1,2,3 Protein supplements may be a convenient means for some busy

athletes to secure additional protein in the diet. Many of these products contain

high-quality protein, such as milk or egg protein; they provide a balanced

mixture of protein, carbohydrate and fat for additional calories; and they may

also contain supplemental vitamins and minerals. It’s important to emphasize

that these supplements should be used as an adjunct to an otherwise balanced

nutritional plan, not as a substitute.

Milk proteins are commercially available as whole milk proteins,

caseinates and whey proteins. Milk protein is approximately 80 percent

caseinate and 20 percent whey protein. Recently, bovine colostrum protein has

been marketed as an ultimate source of protein for athletes. Colostrum is the

first milk secreted by cows after giving birth and is a rich source of protein,

carbohydrates, fats, vitamins, minerals and biologically active components such

as antimicrobial molecules, immunoglobulins and growth factors.

Recent data from our laboratory suggest that colostrum protein has a

higher Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) than calcium caseinate.4 Further, there is

some evidence suggesting colostrum supplementation may increase lean body

mass,5 improve time trial performance in cyclists,6 enhance recovery during

endurance exercise,7 improve sprint performance in hockey players,8 enhance

buffer capacity in female rowers,9 increase peak anaerobic power,10 and

enhance resistance to development of upper respiratory track infection.11

Colostrum and Lean Body Mass

The purpose of a recent study by Dr. Jose Antonio and colleagues was

to determine the effect of eight weeks of colostrum supplementation on body

composition and exercise performance in active men and women.5 Subjects

were randomly assigned to either a placebo (whey protein) group or a colostrum

group (20 grams/day). Each subject participated in aerobic and heavy

resistance training at least three times per week. Body composition was

assessed via dual x-ray absorptometry (DEXA) analysis. Treadmill time to

exhaustion, one repetition maximum strength (bench press), and the total

number of repetitions performed during one set to exhaustion at a submaximal

load for the bench press (50 percent and 100 percent of body weight for women

and men, respectively) were ascertained.

The whey protein group experienced a significant increase in body

weight (mean increase of 2.11 kilograms, or 4.62 pounds), whereas the bovine

colostrum group experienced a significant increase in bone-free lean body mass

(LBM, mean increase of 1.49 kilograms, or 3.28 pounds). However, as pointed

out by Dr. Antonio and coworkers, one must exercise caution with this

interpretation because some investigators have found the coefficient of variation

for lean body mass estimates via DEXA to be as high as 3.1 percent. Certainly,

this is as large as the difference in LBM reported for the colostrumsupplemented

group. Further, there were no changes in any of the other

parameters measured.

Colostrum and Exercise Performance

The purpose of the recent study by Dr. Coombes and colleagues was to

determine the dose effects of colostrum supplementation on cycling

performance.6 Forty-two competitive cyclists were randomly divided into three

groups and were required to consume either 20 grams of colostrum 40 grams

of whey protein; 60 grams of colostrum; or 60 grams of whey protein (placebo).

Two measures were used to assess performance before and after an eightweek

supplementation period. The first measure required subjects to complete

two maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) tests separated by 20 minutes with the

amount of work completed in the second test used to evaluate performance.

The second performance measure was the time to complete a work-based time

trial following a two-hour cycle at 65 percent maximal oxygen uptake. Subjects

were required to maintain their regular training and keep a food and training

diary over the study period.

After supplementation, the performance enhancement in measure one

was not statistically significantly different in the colostrum groups compared to

the placebo group. In performance measure, two subjects in the 20-gram and

60-gram groups completed the time trial significantly faster post-supplement

compared to pre-supplement. The authors concluded that colostrum

supplementation at 20 or 60 grams per day provided a small but significant

improvement in time trial performance in cyclists after a two-hour ride at 65

percent maximal oxygen uptake. Further, the authors postulated that bovine

colostrum supplementation improves small intestine function and nutrient

absorption leading to enhanced nutrient availability to recovering muscle cells.

More recently, Dr. Jonathan Buckley and colleagues examined the

effects of colostrum supplementation on peak vertical jump power, peak cycle

power, alactic anaerobic work capacity and resistance exercise one-repetition

maximum (1-RM).10 Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

parallel design, 51 males completed eight weeks of resistance and plyometric

training while consuming 60 grams per day of colostrum or whey protein. Peak

vertical jump power and peak cycle power were not significantly different

between groups by week four. By week eight, however, peak vertical jump

power and peak cycle power were significantly higher in colostrum condition.

The authors concluded that colostrum supplementation during training

significantly increased peak anaerobic power, but had no effect on alactic work

capacity or 1-RM.

Since colostrum supplementation had no significant effect on 1-RMs in

this study, or in a previous study by Dr. Antonio and co-workers,5 and 1-RM

provides a measure of muscular strength, it’s unlikely that colostrum exerted its

effects by increasing muscle contractile protein content or by recruiting

additional motor units. According to Dr. Buckley and colleagues, it’s more likely

that the increased phosphogenolytic rate may have resulted from an increase in

the relative proportion of fast myosin heavy chain.

Colostrum and IGF-I

Growth hormone is a protein anabolic hormone that produces positive

nitrogen and phosphorous balance, and a fall in the blood urea nitrogen and

amino acid levels. The effects of growth hormone on growth, cartilage and

protein metabolism depend on an interaction between growth and

somatomedins, which are polypeptide growth factors secreted by the liver and

other tissues. The principal (and in humans, probably the only) circulating

somatomedins are insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth

factor 2 (IGF-2). IGF-2 is thought to be a less effective anabolic agent than IGF-

1. The majority of studies support the fact that IGF-1 has significant anabolic

and anticatabolic effects, especially when acting with insulin and GH where

there is an adequate amount of certain amino acids. Thus, increasing

endogenous levels of IGF-1 could be useful for maximizing the effects of

exercise on muscle mass and strength.

The purpose of a study by Dr. Antti Mero and colleagues was to examine

the effects of bovine colostrum supplementation on serum IGF-1 concentrations

during strength and speed training period.12 Bovine colostrum supplement

contained 67.6 micrograms per liter of IGF-1. Nine male sprinters and jumpers

underwent three randomized experimental training treatments of eight days

separated by 13 days. The only difference in the treatments was the drink of

125 milliliters consumed per day. Post-exercise increases were noticed for

serum IGF-1 in the 25-milliliter bovine colostrum treatment (125 ml contained 25

ml colostrum) and especially in the 125-milliliter bovine colostrum treatment

(125 ml contained 125 ml colostrum) compared with the placebo (whey protein)

treatment.

However, investigators used a radioimmunoassay that measures both

the IGF-1 and its associated binding proteins. A more appropriate and accepted

procedure is to remove the binding protein before measuring IGF-1.

Furthermore, the negligible change in IGF-1 level could be due to the training

effect. As might be expected and as found in normal physiology, the observed

exercise-associated rise in growth hormone would be mirrored by a rise in

circulating IGF-1. Finally, it should be noted that the initial mean level of IGF-1

was somewhat greater in the placebo group. This means the possibility that

reasons other than colostrum supplementation may have contributed to the

differences in the IGF-1 concentration between the groups.

In follow-up study, Dr. Mero and coworkers examined the effects of

bovine colostrum supplementation on blood and saliva variables and the

absorption of orally administered human recombinant IGF (rhIGF-1) labeled

with 123iodine. Authors concluded that long-term supplementation of bovine

colostrum increases serum IGF-1 concentration in athletes during training.

However, absorption data gives no support to the absorption of intact IGF-1

from bovine colostrum.

We recently examined effects of colostrum supplementation on serum

IGF-1, growth hormone (GH) and testosterone. In order to avoid effects of

exercise, serum concentration of IGF-1, GH and testosterone were measured

initially (day 0) and before the first exercise test (day 11) in all subjects. Serum

IGF-1, GH and testosterone concentrations were within the reference ranges

and no statistically significant changes were seen in response to 11 days

administration of colostrum or placebo (whey protein). Further, the counts of red

blood cells, leukocytes, thrombocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, cortisol and

interleukin-6 were within reference limits at the beginning of the experimental

period and did not show significant changes during colostrum or placebo

supplementation.

Colostrum and Upper Respiratory Tract Infection

Colostrum is a rich source of immunoglobulins. Circulating

immunoglobulins protect their host by binding to and neutralizing some protein

toxins; by blocking the attachment of some viruses to cells; by opsonizing

bacteria (making it more susceptible to cell action that absorbs harmful

microorganisms); and by activating proteins in blood plasma that aid in

destruction of harmful bacteria. Immunoglobulin A is the major immunoglobulin

found in mucosal secretions, which constitute the first barrier to the entry of

pathogens into the body. Consequently, the level of secretory immunoglobulin A

contained in mucosal fluids has been shown to correlate highly with resistance

to certain infections caused by viruses, such as upper respiratory tract infection.

Recently, Dr. Mero and colleagues reported that colostrum increases salivary

immunoglobulin A concentrations after two weeks of supplementation.12

Therefore, it is possible that an increase in salivary immunoglobulin A may

protect against the development of upper respiratory tract infection.

Drs. Grant Brinkworth and Jonathan Buckley examined whether

colostrum affected the incidence or duration of self-reported symptoms of upper

respiratory tract infection in adult males. One hundred and seventy-four healthy,

physically active adult males comprised the sample for this study. During the

supplementation period, 93 subjects consumed colostrum, while 81 consumed

whey protein. During the pre-experimental period, there was no significant

difference in proportion of subjects taking the different supplements who

reported symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection.

During the seven-week experimental period, a significantly lesser

proportion of subjects taking colostrum reported symptoms of upper respiratory

tract infection compared with those taking whey protein. Thirty-two percent of

subjects taking colostrum reporting at least one episode of upper respiratory

tract infection, compared with 48 percent who were taking whey protein.

This study provides preliminary evidence that colostrum may enhance

resistance to the development of symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection

in young adult males. However, colostrum appeared to have no effect on the

duration of symptoms once they developed, indicating that it’s unlikely to be

useful as a therapeutic treatment for upper respiratory tract infection once

infection has occurred.


 

Other articles by Anssi Manninen



 

© 2000-2024 Steroid.com By viewing this page you agree and understand our Privacy Policy and Disclaimer. return to top of page
Anabolic Steroids
 
Anabolic Review